Ace Media News

Wednesday 9 November 2011

The final installment of the hugely successful Harry Potter franchise has been nominated for a whopping four awards, as well as nominations for all of it’s four leading stars, in the upcoming People’s Choice 2012 Awards.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 has been nominated in the Ensemble Movie Cast, Book Adaptation, Movie and Action Movie categories, with Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Tom Felton set to face off in the Movie Star Under 25 category.

The People’s Choice Awards remain faithful to their name, allowing the general public to vote for their favorite stars, TV shows, music and movies via an online ballot, up until December 6.

PHOTOS: The Best, Worst & Wackiest Fashions Of The 2011 MTV EMA Awards

As well as battling his co-stars Radcliffe will also be facing off against some of today’s hottest male talent, as he is also nominated in the Movie Actor category, which includes Robert Pattinson, Hugh Jackman, Ryan Reynolds and Johnny Depp.

Meanwhile, there’s also tough competition in the Best Actress category with Julia Roberts, Reese Witherspoon, Anne Hathaway, Emma Stone and Jennifer Aniston all vying for the top spot.

PHOTOS: Selena Gomez And Other Stars At The MTV European Music Awards

The People’s Choice Awards will take place on January 11, 2012.

Nominations include:

Movie Actor
Daniel Radcliffe
Hugh Jackman
Johnny Depp
Robert Pattinson
Ryan Reynolds

Movie Actress
Anne Hathaway
Emma Stone
Jennifer Aniston
Julia Roberts
Reese Witherspoon

Movie Star Under 25
Chloe Moretz
Daniel Radcliffe
Emma Watson
Rupert Grint
Tom Felton

Movie
Bridesmaids
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2
The Help
Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides
Transformers: Dark of the Moon

Network TV Drama
'The Good Wife'
'Grey’s Anatomy'
'House'
'Supernatural'
'The Vampire Diaries'

TV Drama Actor
David Boreanaz
Hugh Laurie
Ian Somerhalder
Nathan Fillion
Patrick Dempsey

TV Drama Actress
Blake Lively
Ellen Pompeo
Emily Deschanel
Eva Longoria
Nina Dobrev

Network TV Comedy
'The Big Bang Theory'
'Glee'
'How I Met Your Mother'
'Modern Family'
'Two and a Half Men'

Album of the Year
21 by Adele
4 by Beyonce
Born This Way by Lady Gaga
Femme Fatale by Britney Spears
Own The Night by Lady Antebellum

Male Artist
Blake Shelton
Bruno Mars
Eminem
Enrique Iglesias
Justin Bieber

Female Artist
Adele
Beyonce
Katy Perry
Lady Gaga
Taylor Swift

VIDEO: Adam Sandler Sports Black Eye At People's Choice Awards

Tuesday 8 November 2011

Racist Social Bookmarking Service Mister Wong Goes Up for Sale

Racist Social Bookmarking Service Mister Wong Goes Up for Sale:

German social bookmarking service Mister Wong was, not so long ago, an ambitious, well-used, innovative project. It was also the subject of heated international controversy online. Today the service finds itself put up for sale by parent company Construktiv. In a post on the company's German language blog, Mister Wong says its changing priorities require it to seek a new operator.

Mister Wong instituted a number of different features appreciated by users, like automatic Twitter sync to save shared links, a Delicious importer and an attractive mobile version of the site. The service also faced a substantial amount of criticism, though, for its name and branding. So much criticism that it provided an interesting opportunity to talk about contemporary racial stereotypes, the importance of intention and more.

Sponsor

Then-smaller social media website Mashable wrote about Mister Wong's US launch in 2007, where author Kristen Nicole called the service's name "questionable."

People around the world objected loudly to the company's name and to its logo, a picture of a stooped, balding old Asian man with slanted lines for eyes. Asian American engineer Ernie Hsiung penned the most widely-read critique on a site called 8Asians. "One of their web badges has the slogan 'ping pong, king kong, Mister Wong.' Which I, of course, interpret as 'ching chong, Mister Wong' and get INCREDIBLY FUCKING ANGRY," Hsiung wrote. "It's like Jeeves, the ask.com butler and Uncle Ben had a stereotypical illegitimate Asian son."

Specifically, the image referenced the stereotypical image of people from Asia as cheerfully subservient, worn-out people who tend to menial tasks for others. That image denies a huge portion of the world its history of centuries of diverse great cultures, it dehumanizes the complex and painful history of millions of Asian migrants and reduces billions of people to a caricature. That stereotypical caricature then stands in between the eyes and minds of those who accept it and the billions of people in and from Asia, struggling to move freely around the world and live their lives.

Of all the images of people from Asia that a person could spend time with - this is the one that Mister Wong users bring to mind every time they find a link on the web they want to save?

Imagine being black and being surrounded by white people who picture a dancing minstrel show whenever they think about black people. (Or more often today, gangsters or rappers.) That would be a hard situation to be respected in.

Three weeks after Mister Wong's US launch, Mashable founder Pete Cashmore posted an article titled Mister Wong: Not Racist. That article referenced Mister Wong's German CEO Kai Tietjen's public statement that the company never intended to offend anyone but also asserting that some of the criticism the company faced was "below the belt, unfounded, and inappropriate." (I'm sure the critics didn't intend that to be the case, so that means it's ok, right?)

Cashmore wrote:

These kinds of clashes seem inevitable when companies launch globally: what's culturally acceptable in one place is a hanging offense elsewhere. Often, as in this case, people are puzzled by the fact that they caused any offense at all. The 'racist' label, however, is one that all startups will want to stay a million miles away from, even if they don't fully understand their infraction.

What exactly he means by that is a little unclear (coming from Scotland, he was probably drunk and playing bagpipes when he wrote it) but the headline of the post seemed clear - Mister Wong:Not Racist.

Rarely are people convinced to reconsider their perspectives on such matters, but the controversy concerning Mister Wong's then-logo and still present name did provide an opportunity for extensive discussion. It will be interesting to see if anyone wants to buy a brand like that, though. The company's brand was based on a thoughtless stereotype and you might say it got taken the cleaners.

Writing on Germany's Netzwertig writer Martin Weigert argues that social bookmarking never became more than a niche practice and that big social networks like Facebook and Twitter are sufficient for what most people want to do with links of interest. To share them, not save them.

More important than the viability of social bookmarking is the ongoing conversation about race in the world of technology. The people building the social web talk about social engineering and user experience all the time. Discussing the cultural politics of the web seems like an important part of that discussion, in terms of pure utility. It's also an important part of making the world a more just place.

Discuss About time it was never right to have a racist bookmarking site, what do you think?

Monday 24 October 2011

Video Conferencing ? The Pros And Cons Of Video Conferencing ...

Video Conferencing ? The Pros And Cons Of Video Conferencing ...: clipped by: hodgmanjohn
clipper's remarks: Video Conferencing ? The Pros And Cons Of Video Conferencing ...

Clip Source: budgetvacationideas.valedor.info

Article by Cheow Yu Yuan

Many businesses conduct video conferencing during meetings. Video conferencing allows you to call anyone in the world and not only speak to them, but also see them on the projector or computer screen. Video conferencing is meant for larger audience such as a conference or meeting, rather than serving the needs of an individual.

As technology becomes more advanced, businesses have made video conferencing an important activity during meetings. However, video conferencing has its pros and cons.

Video conferencing advantages:

1. Able to reach anyone in the world and almost immediately. With video conferencing, there is no need for anyone to travel long distance for conferences and meetings. There will be no geographical and time boundary.

2. Works well for a large audience. During video conferencing, PowerPoint slides and visual display can be projected on a large screen for everyone present in a room. This makes it suitable for conducting conferences and meetings with larger crowd.

3. Allow people at different locations to interact with one another effectively and easily. A phone call only allows 2 people to interact with one another. However, with video conferencing, it allows people from different locations to interact with one another effectively. 3 people in Singapore can interact with 5 people in China and another 3 people in the States easily, with everyone able to hear and see perfectly.

Video conferencing disadvantages:

1. Expensive. The price of a good video conferencing system may be a major concern for most people. So if you do not need advanced features, there are cheap options for you to choose from. However, if you know how to make use of those advanced features, you may find that the money you save flying employees and clients around the country will more than makes up the cost of the video conferencing system. Before you buy any system, make sure that you know what your needs are so that you can get the right one for your company.

2. Lost of human touch. Eye contact is very important during a communication. However with video conferencing, eye contact is not easily delivered through the camera.

Now that you have a list of pros and cons of video conferencing, it is now up to you to decide whether video conferencing is necessary for your business. Before you buy any system, make sure that you conduct a thorough research first so as to choose the best system for your company.

Source: http://informeveryone.com/video-conferencing/video-conferencing-the-pros-and-cons-of-video-conferencing/

olivia newton john coke indianapolis indianapolis jennifer lawrence wayne rooney man u vs arsenal

Tags: a, b, c

Thursday 29 September 2011

The Beatles - She Loves You [HD]

ALWAYS SAVE THE BEST TO LAST AND THE FIRST OF MANY SONGS THAT REALLY LAUNCHED THE LADS CAREERS.

The Beatles - She Loves You [HD]:

The Beatles - She Loves You [HD]
"She Loves You" is a song written by John Lennon and Paul McCartney based on an idea by McCartney, originally recorded by The Beatles for release as a single in 1963.

The single set and surpassed several records in the United Kingdom charts, and set a record in the United States by being one of the five Beatles songs which held the top five positions in the American charts simultaneously.

It is The Beatles' best-selling single in the United Kingdom, and was the best selling single in Britain in 1963.

"She Loves You" was credited to "Lennon/McCartney" as were all subsequent songs written by the pair and released during the remainder of the band's tenure.

With the exception of the single version of "Love Me Do" and "P.S. I Love You", all prior songs were credited as "McCartney/Lennon". The sequence was a source of controversy when McCartney changed it to "McCartney/Lennon" for some live versions released later in his career.